Tuesday, July 05, 2005

Alright, so

I got up at 10:00 this morning, had a late night celebrating the birth of our nation, Read Reece's post, and by 10:11 I had my post out in response. I start checking the daily news. Went to Salon, read the "Daou report" their list of blogs, and here a scant 25 minutes after waking up to another beautiful God-given day, my blood is up, and I am pissed.

Can these people be more stupid?

http://www.blogsforbush.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4824

Lets have a face off!

In corner 1! Weighing in at a scant few ounces. Hailing all the way from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the senior man on the circuit, the U.S. Constitution!!!! (crowd going wild noises here).

In Corner 2, Currently hailing from Las Vegas, Nevada, weighing God knows how much (as I have never met the man, although I could imagine how that statement could be taken as a personal attack), the up and coming kid, Mark Noonan! (booo-hiss!)

Given its historical strength, the Constitution bravely decides to let Mr. Noonan go first!

Mr. Noonan: "the President gets to pick whomever he wants,"

Oooh-a nice first jab, a little fascistic, but not bad (i know another personal attack) I mean we all should just let the President do what he wants right? He is our fearless leader. He knows what is right and what is wrong, that is why we picked him right? How will the constitution reply to such an opening?

U.S. Constitution: The president "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court,"

OOOOOH Smack! That has to sting Mr. Noonan, he should be dazed and confused right now. Wow. I can't see anyone coming back from that!

Mr. Noonan: "and the American Constitution and our political traditions require an up or down vote on the nominee."

What? that doesn't make any sense. what a strange way to attack the Constitution. That isn't a response to the Constitution. That is just gibberish. Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. How will the constitution reply to such a statement? This is getting interesting folks.
Mr. Constitution, what is your response?

U.S. Constitution: . . . . . . .

The U.S. Constitution doesn't have a response?!?!?! This truly is a tragic day. it is almost as if Mr. Noonan never read the Constitution. He doesn't even know what is in the document! The constitution cannot win this fight when put up against someone with such a strange attack. By convienently ignoring the Constitution, and walking out of the ring... Wait! Wait, what is going on down there? It appears that Mr. Noonan is proclaiming victory! This is crazy, I have never seen a fighter leave the ring and then proclaim victory. Apparently Matt Drudge is now reporting Mr. Noonan's victory on his webpage. What?!? hang on folks, a new report is coming in from CNN, they are saying that Matt Drudge is reporting Mr. Noonan's Victory of Rhetoric over the U.S. Constitution. This is getting stranger by the minute folks, but now Drudge is reporting that the mainstream media, specifically CNN is confirming his story, specifically confirming that he is reporting that Noonan won. At times like these, all I can say is OOOOOOHHHHHH THE HUMANITY!

No comments: